Matching, mismatching and rematching: literal interpretation in legal and literary argumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21119/anamps.61.7-35Keywords:
literal interpretation, literary argumentation, legal argumentationAbstract
Starting, on the one hand, from the existence of literal interpretation in the legal and literary spheres and, on the other hand, from their different status in these fields of study, the following question arises: how can a meeting point between the status of the literal interpretation method be possible between the fields of law and literature? To that end, it is necessary to have a perspective of argumentation pragmatics in general, in attempt to reveal a meeting point between literal interpretation in legal and in literary argumentation.
Downloads
References
ALEXY, Robert. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1989. 352p.
ATIENZA, Manuel. Las razones del derecho. México: UNAM-IIJ, 2003. 246p.
ATIENZA, Manuel. El derecho como argumentación. Barcelona: Ariel, 2006. 316p.
ATIENZA, Manuel. Curso de argumentación jurídica. Madrid: Trotta, 2013. 872p.
BAILLEUX, Antoine. Le soft law et les deux droits. In: DUMONT, Hughes et al. (ed.). Les sources du droit revisitées, tomo IV. Bruxelles: Anthémis, 2013. p. 503-537.
BENNION, Francis. Statutory interpretation. Londres: Butterworths, 2002. 1284p.
CAYLA, Olivier. La chose et son contraire (et son contraire, etc…). Les Études Philosophiques, n. 3, p. 291-310, julio-septiembre 1999.
CÔTÉ, Pierre-André. Interprétation des lois. Cowansville: Blais, 1990. 695p.
COVARRUBIAS CORREA, Andrés. Introducción a la retórica clásica: una teoría de la argumentación práctica. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, 2003. 131p.
COVER, Robert. Violence and the Word. Yale Law Journal, v. 95, p. 1601-1629, 1986.
DE VATTEL, Emer. Le droit des gens ou principles de la loi naturelle. Londres, 1758. 375p. [liv. II, ch. XVII]. Disponible en: http://oll-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/titles/1051/0586-01_Bk.pdf. Acceso en: 10 sept. 2019.
DICIOTTI, Enrico. Interpretazione della legge e discorso razionale. Torino: Giappichelli, 1999. 624p.
LUZZATI, Claudio. La vaghezza delle norme. Milano: Giuffrè, 1990. 444p.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Law as interpretation. Texas Law Review, n. 60, p. 179-200, 1982.
DWORKIN, Ronald. My Reply to Stanley Fish (and Walter Benn Michaels): Please Don’t Talk about Objectivity Any More. In: MITCHELL, Thomas. The Politics of Interpretations. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983. p. 287-313.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Justicia para erizos. México: FCE, 2014.
ECO, Umberto. Les limites de l’interpretation. Paris: Grasset, 1992. 408p.
FISH, Stanley. Fish v. Fiss. Stanford Law Review, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1325-1347, 1984.
FISS, Owen. Conventionalism. Southern California Law Review, v. 58, p. 739-763, 1985.
FISH, Stanley. Don’t Know Much About the Middle Ages: Posner on Law and Literature. The Yale Law Journal, v. 97, p. 777-793, 1988.
FISH, Stanley. Respecter le sens commun. Rhétorique, interprétation et critique en littérature et en droit. Paris: StoryScientia-LGDJ, 1995. 309p.
FRYDMAN, Benoît. Exègese et philologie: un cas d’herméneutique comparée. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, v. 33, p. 59-83, 1994.
GUASTINI, Riccardo. Interprétation et description de normes. In: AMSELEK, Paul (ed.). Interprétation et droit. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1995. p. 89-102.
GUASTINI, Riccardo. Le réalisme juridique rédefini. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of law, v. 19, p. 113-129, 2013.
HÉBERT, Louis. Analyse des textes littéraires. Une méthodologie complète. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2014. 346p.
KELSEN, Hans. The Law of The United Nations: a critical analysis of its fundamental problems. New Jersey: The Law Exchange, 1949. 1014p.
KELSEN, Hans. Teoría pura del derecho.México: UNAM, 1982. 358p.
KONCA, Paulina. Creating an interpretative law – indispensable or impossible?. 29th IVR World Congress, International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 2019 Lucerne, Switzerland. 10p.
MACCORMICK, Neil; SUMMERS, Robert (ed.). Interpreting statutes: A comparative study. Darthmouth: Aldeshot, 1991. 576p.
MAINGUENEAU, Dominique. Interprétation des textes littéraires et des juridiques. In: AMSELEK, Paul (ed.). Droit et interprétation. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1995. p. 61-72.
OST, François. Derecho y literatura: en la frontera entre los imaginarios jurídico y literario. In: TORRES, Oscar. Derecho & Literatura. El derecho en la literatura. México: Libitum, 2017.p. 21-50.
OST, François; VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel. Entre la lettre et l’esprit. Les directives d’interprétation en droit. Les directives d’interprétation en droit. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1989. 334p.
OST, François; VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel. Les colonnes d’Hermes: à propos des directives d’interpretation en droit. In: AMSELEK, Paul (ed.). Droit et interprétation. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1995. p. 135-153.
OST, François; VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel. ¿De la pirámide a la red? Por una teoría dialéctica del derecho. México: Libitum, 2018. 582p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm; OLBRECTHS-TYTECA, Lucie. Traité de l’argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958. 740p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm. Le droit, les sciences humaines et la philosophie. Paris: Vrin, 1973a. 408p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm. Justice et raison. Bruxelles: Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1973b. 256p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm. Logique juridique. Nouvelle Rhétorique. Paris: Dalloz, 1976. 194p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm. L’empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation. Paris: Vrijn, 2000. 194p.
PERELMAN, Chaïm. Éthique et droit. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2012. 825p.
POSNER, Richard. Law and Literature: a Misunderstood Relation. Cambridge: Massachusetts, 1988. 371p.
RAUCENT, Léon. Droit et linguistique: une approche formaliste du droit. Les cahiers du droit, v. 19, n. 3, p. 575-594, 1978.
REBOUL, Olivier. Introduction à la rhétorique. Paris: PUF. 2013. 246p.
RICOEUR, Paul. Le juste; 2. Paris: Esprit, 2001. 297p.
SAVIGNY, Friedrich Karl von. Sistema del Derecho Romano actual; v. I. Madrid: Centro Editorial de Gongora, 1878. 492p.
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. L’objet de la critique littéraire. Paris: Questions théoriques, 2009. 268p.
VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel. La doctrine du sens clair des textes et la jurisprudence de la Cour de Cassation de Belgique. In: VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel (ed.). Interprétation et droit. Approche pluridisciplinaire. Bruselas: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, 1978. p. 13-50.
VEGA REÑÓN, Luis. Si de argumentar se trata. Valencia: Montesinos, 2007. 291p.
WHITE, James Boyd. The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression. Boston: Little Brown Company, 1973. 1024p.
WHITE, James Boyd. What a Lawyer can learn from Literature?. Harvard Law Review, n. 102, p. 2014-2047, 1989.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal ANAMORPHOSIS the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journaL - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.